Saturday, January 31, 2026

What life is like on a ship in the stormy north sea

Coal is Extremely Dumb


@john2001plus
Tell it to the Chinese who keep building coal plants.

Reportedly, Biden closed coal plants.  What gives him that right?   Shouldn't people have the free choice to use coal if that is their best option?  I'm not saying it is their best option, but do we live in a free society where people can make choices?  Is coal so bad that the choice should be taken away?  I acknowledge that it might be.  I am also concerned about pollutants.

If solar and batteries are cheaper in 30 years then people will choose that, but I'm skeptical because I have been hearing this for decades.  I'm also not sure that so-called renewables can meet our energy needs.  For the moment, fossil fuels are the most reliable sources of energy.

We don't have infinite energy resources.  Reportedly, we have about 45 to 50 years of oil reserves remaining. Likewise, I have heard that most fossil fuels will be depleted by the year 2100.  Ironically, the fossil fuel that will last the longest, and the one that we will be forced to use in the next century, is coal.

I've long thought that geothermal would be a limitless source of energy, and I've heard that some progress has been made in that area.

I am a climate alarmism skeptic because of the data on temperature and CO2.  Around 2010, actual climate scientists were saying that the Climate Sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 is 6 to 12 degrees celsius.  I watched many videos about this.  However, the data doesn't support this at all.  The data indicates that it might be around 2 degrees.  Early in that decade, it was very common to hear them say, "We are on track to raise the average atmospheric temperature by 3 degrees by the year 2100, and that would be bad.  However, if we can get it down to 2 degrees then this would still be bad, but manageable."  I heard this repeatedly.   However, by the end of the decade, I was watching videos where the numbers had changed.  They gave the exact same speech, but said that 2 degrees would be very bad, but if we could just get it down to 1.5 degrees then that would be manageable.  They moved the goal post.  The reasons for this might be complicated, but I remember the IPCC accepting a paper that cited 20nth century data indicating that the climate sensitivity might only be 1.5 degrees.

Saturday, January 24, 2026

The Night Texas Hit 140°F (60°C) During a Thunderstorm

The atmosphere is inherently turbulent, so it doesn't surprise me that weird weather can happen.

I don't think that humans can survive 140 degrees for four hours.  Reportedly, people took shelter in storm cellars and basements and used wet cloths to cool off.  

I'm not sure how many people had air conditioning in 1960, although it became more common in the 60s and 70s.  

This is a rare meteorological event.  If it happened today, we would probably survive because of AC, although we might be pretty hot for a while.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5sBhpmTjn0&t=974s

It goes without saying that unnatural events can produce deadly heat.  I'm thinking of nuclear weapons.  In the (unlikely) event of a nuclear blast, you should stay indoors, preferably in a basement for about 3 days.  Reportedly, radiation from fallout will drop by 99% in 49 hours.  However, being indoors doesn't guarantee your safety, and reportedly you have about 45 minutes after the blast to evacuate the affected area, which in theory could spread over a large area.  Since nuclear weapons produce an EMP, it is possible that nothing electrical will work.

Just as a precaution, I keep a supply of bottled water, enough to last a few days.

We Just Discovered 'Alien' Bacteria in Space

Skeptical Hedonism and Plane Crashes

Thursday, January 22, 2026

How long would you survive with no DNA?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3oLIDaElaE

Our cells need RNA to perform their functions, and they make RNA by transcribing DNA.  The RNAs are used up very quickly because they act like instructions from the cell's nucleus to the cell's machinery.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

This Food Component Cuts Visceral Fat in Half (Science-backed)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jII_IDTCw-o

I'm not sure how to eat this food, and 40G seems excessive.


Likewise, he recommends 40G fiber.  Again, this seems way excessive.  A 12 oz package of mixed vegetables, which claims to be 4 servings, has 12G of fiber per package.  I like eating vegetables with something that tastes good, like chicken nuggets, chicken strips, or ravioli.  

I also get fiber from fruit.  I try to eat an apple every day, because doing so reportedly can lower cholesterol.

Too much of either substance will have intestinal effects, like gas, because they are broken down by gut bacteria.  I've been trying to eat fiber to deal with constipation.








Monday, January 12, 2026

Why USA Built a Giant Wall from Canada to Texas

Large-scale Vitamin D study on Telomeres, an important Marker of Aging


john2001plus
0 seconds ago
I'm concerned that the study doesn't control for the Omega-3 intake, although taking both sounds like a good idea.  I'm already taking Vitamin D.   However, I'm not a doctor nor a medical expert.  

I'm also concerned that he doesn't provide a link to the study.  I found the article on the The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition website:  https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(25)00255-2/abstract

I believe in, "Trust, but verify".  I would like to see more studies.  

According to Google AI...

"Yes, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (AJCN) is a highly reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing primary research, considered a top source in nutrition and dietetics, though it's published by the American Society for Nutrition (ASN), which receives funding from food/beverage industry partners, a point some critics raise regarding potential influence. Its high impact factor and publication of rigorous studies on topics like obesity, metabolism, and vitamins underscore its scientific standing. "

Sunday, January 11, 2026

94% of the Universe is Gone Forever


It seems pointless to talk about 2 trillion years from now.  Fifty thousand years ago, at the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic, humans appeared to get smarter, inventing new tools and the first permanent structures.  A million years ago our ancestors were Homo Erectus.  

A million years from now, and maybe much sooner, humans will look different and most likely be adapted for a new kind of existence, such as space travel.  A million years is enough time to evolve into a new species.

There is no guarantee that we will survive that long, but I have faith that people will find a way.  The Earth will only be able to support life for about a billion years.

Animal Protein

Why Concrete Tetrapods Are Genius AND Deadly