Wednesday, September 23, 2026
Tennessee Stellarator Fusion Plant License
Tennessee grants first fusion license for 400MW stellarator plant
Maybe getting a license is the first step toward building a reactor. I'm not sure whether this represents some sort of breakthrough toward practical fusion. I don't know enough about it to say.
Although practical nuclear fusion would be a tremendous breakthrough for mankind, I am extremely skeptical that we will reach it anytime soon.
If I can believe the numbers I have seen on solar and wind, we should be able to supplement our slowly declining fossil fuel reserves with them. They are not my favorite ways to generate power, however, because of their reliability issues.
For a really long time, I have thought that geothermal was interesting. My reasoning is that there is a tremendous amount of energy inside the planet.
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Monday, September 21, 2026
Sunday, September 20, 2026
Trump says some childhood vaccines will be split into separate shots
- The MMR Vaccine: Massive global studies tracking millions of children across the U.S., Denmark, the U.K., and Japan found absolutely no difference in autism rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. [1, 2]
- Genetics: Strong hereditary factors account for most cases, with single gene variants and familial risk playing massive roles.
Saturday, September 19, 2026
Wednesday, September 16, 2026
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
This Woman Cured Her Cancer with an Insane Method
There have been reports of COVID-19 shrinking tumors, but not consistently.
Monday, September 14, 2026
Sunday, September 13, 2026
Saturday, September 12, 2026
Psychiatrist: “Everyone Is Wrong About The Lindsay Clancy Case”
Friday, September 11, 2026
Thursday, September 10, 2026
The Brutal Reality of Traveling to Another Star
There are five things that make interstellar space travel nearly impossible.
- Earth-like planets are very rare. We are unlikely to encounter worlds that would be worth traveling to.
- Space is full of deadly radiation that is difficult to shield against. This becomes exponentially worse at high fractions of the speed of light. At those speeds, even simple interstellar dust particles become explosive missiles that could destroy a spacecraft.
- The distances are so vast that interstellar travel becomes extremely difficult.
- The energy requirements are enormous. We simply don't have the resources to accelerate a spaceship to anything approaching relativistic speeds.
- The cost is enormous. It could take the resources of an entire planet to create an interstellar ship.
If we wanted to send a probe to a nearby star, we would have to send a computer AI with heavy shielding at a modest speed and be willing to wait 50,000 years for the ship to arrive. However, if we did this in the near future, it could be self-defeating because future generations will likely be able to create faster ships that could arrive in a fraction of the time. Being able to create a ship twice as fast a thousand years from now would make the first ship we send pointless.
I feel the same way about sending humans to Mars. It is such a perilous and expensive journey, just to go to a big, dead rock with about a third of Earth's gravity. We will never have a viable colony on Mars because the planet is simply too hostile. It is far too cold, has significant radiation hazards, and its chemical makeup is not conducive to human life.
It seems possible, if not likely, that life could have existed on Mars billions of years ago. Finding that out might be interesting, but we don't have to send people to Mars to study the planet. We can send unmanned probes much more cost-effectively.
The future of humanity does not involve expanding out to the stars, at least not in the next few thousand years. Although we could create orbital habitats, these will never be cost-effective. The real future of humanity involves making the best use of the resources on planet Earth. We need to manage the planet well while slowing population growth, which creates more competition and conflict over natural resources. The vast fortunes that we spend on space exploration could be better spent managing our existence on Earth.
We live on Spaceship Earth, which is traveling around the galaxy at 140 miles per second. Not all the stars in the Milky Way travel at the same speed, so in 1.29 million years, another star will come within 0.14 light-years of our star. That is close enough to send a space probe. We just have to be patient. 😀
Tuesday, September 8, 2026
Magnetism #Science #Magnets
@alexpoiry3988
5 days ago
If anyone is interested, I think this is a ferrocell. Basically there is a small amount of very dilute ferrofluid trapped between 2 transparent plates. The edge lighting scatters the light so you can see the effect of the magnetic waves.
Saturday, September 5, 2026
Tuesday, September 1, 2026
Joe Rogan Is Blown Away by What Homo Erectus Could Do
Homo Erectus emerged around 1.9 to 2 million years ago in Africa. They went extinct roughly 110,000 years ago. They also evolved into other human species.
I suspect that they didn't seem much different to our ancestors.
There is some evidence of different human species interbreeding. This includes humans and Neanderthals, but also Homo Erectus with Denisovans.
Modern Europeans have about 1% to 2% Neanderthal DNA in their individual genomes, with essentially 100% of people with European ancestry carrying these traces.
Monday, August 31, 2026
Sunday, August 30, 2026
Friday, August 28, 2026
The Math Problem That Breaks Evolutions' Timeline
From: John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: The Math Problem That Breaks Evolution’s Timeline
To: Grant
I think that people misunderstand both entropy, which applies to a closed system and not to the Earth as a whole, and evolution.
According to Google, every human child typically receives about 50 to 90 new mutations that were not present in either parent's DNA. I view every biological organism as a new genetic experiment. The changes in one generation might not be significant, but these changes accumulate over time and combine with changes from other individuals.
It is unlikely for organisms to remain exactly the same over long periods of time. There are a few exceptions where organisms have been so successful that they have remained essentially the same for tens of millions of years. However, I think it is unlikely that humans will be the same tens of thousands of years from now, given that humans have changed somewhat over the last few tens of thousands of years.
I prefer a more traditional view of God, in which He is the creator of the laws of physics and not constrained by them.
The simpler explanation for the origin of species is not that they came from other worlds or that some form of magic created them. The simpler explanation is that they arose naturally through the laws of nature as evidenced by the clear observations we have made.
John,When I was young I would have agreed with you completely. In Jr High, my math teacher, Dr Edwin Hershey, believed Darwinism but also believed in scripture and God as the creator. Personally I had spiritual experiences testifying of a loving Father, but I accepted science without significant questioning. More recently, a geological engineer friend lent me a book by the head of the geology department at the U of U who likewise believed in God but accepted Darwinism as one of His tools and didn't see a conflict. They held that God directs nature but didn't create the laws, a little like my wife creating and maintaining our garden but not making the plants from nothing. I.E. from youth I was taught that God did not create the laws of nature but rather mastered them including laws we do not yet know or comprehend. He also has somehow mastered time or else how could the prophets correctly foretell the future, such as Isaiah, Daniel, David and Book of Mormon prophets detailing events of Christ's birth, ministry, crucifiction and resurrection, plus foretelling events of our day, including the return of the Jews to Jerusalem, the Civil War starting in South Carolina (JS) and world wars and earthquakes coupled with signs in the heavens such as our numerous solar and lunar eclipses including the moon turning to blood which many will shortly witness. Natural disasters aren't new, but the apparent increased frequency and severity are consistent with prophecy. As I studied more science (e.g. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics) and engineering this whole creation process would require even more time than timelines suggest, which is what this author is saying about whales and implying in more general terms.In the scriptural and scientific observation, simpler organisms came before more complex ones, and plants had to prepare the way for the animal kingdom. My personal conclusion (not doctrine) is that perhaps evolution, according to updated Darwinism, could have resulted in all the life forms we have but they were generally developed elsewhere over much more time on other worlds. God then followed the creative sequence from Genesis which per my interpretation matches the order from textbooks where plants largely preceded animals (in order to have oxygen for the animal kingdom) and protected sea life came before birds (dinosaurs) and mammals and finally man. Under this scenario, God placed on earth a variety of life in the sea and then placed seeds upon the earth for grasses, trees etc. and then later placed various species of mammals, culminating in anthropoids and hominids. There were destructive periods as well and he finally placed Adam and Eve in a garden in Eden. Were they the culmination of evolution or created from scratch? I don't think it matters, but they were grand beings who were expelled from Eden for sin and entered the already "lone and dreary world" where creatures had been dying for millions of years as evidenced by fossils, coal and limestone formed in the depths of the oceans. Personal belief: We are principally descendents from Adam and Eve, corresponding to written histories, and most of the hominids died out with the mammoths, saber tooth tigers and giant land sloths at the last ice age and from subsequent wars; however, Adam's posterity gave us written records and greater civilization, but there were a few men already in the world, so Cane, for instance, had no problem finding a wife after he killed Abel and was forced to leave.
Summary: My scientific/mathematical concern is that more time is required to create all the coordinated extremely complex diversity than is allocated by geologists and anthropologists. My engineering training says "don't reinvent the wheel", meaning if there is a god or gods (including alien theories), planting seeds and placing animals on earth is much easier and less time consuming than waiting for them to evolve and stay on the right productive path, which is statistically virtually impossible per the principle of entropy, without a divine overseer.
Wednesday, August 26, 2026
Tuesday, August 25, 2026
The Math Problem That Breaks Evolution’s Timeline
What a waste of time.
The main problem with these arguments is that they don't take into account the massive parallelism taking place across the entire species, with genes coming from multiple ancestors and genetic errors accumulating over many generations. The genetic pool is effectively a soup of randomness. Nature weeds out the worst combinations, with up to half of all pregnancies terminating spontaneously before the mother even knows that she is pregnant.
The other problem is that we know evolution happened from the evidence in the fossil record and from genetics. Two facts are strongly supported by evidence:
1. The Earth is very old.
2. Simpler organisms came before more complex ones.
Where did the more complex organisms come from? You could say that they were created by God, but we don't have good evidence for that. The scientific explanation is that complex organisms arose from simpler ones.
Monday, August 24, 2026
Is this trans thought experiment just wrong?
16 hours ago (edited)
A person's feelings about their body do not make a man a woman or a woman a man, nor is it possible to make the switch. A trans person will never be able to produce children. The changes are cosmetic only and don't change the fundamental reality of a person's biology. It seems to me that people are sold a lie about gender affirming care.
From what I read, some people do benefit psychologically from surgery. However, this is a serious operation that does irreversible damage to the body, with potential complications. Maybe psychological care would be more appropriate?
Some of us didn't exactly win the genetics lottery. We have to deal with the reality of our bodies instead of some fantasy. Surgery only becomes needed when it is medically necessary.
Sunday, August 23, 2026
Saturday, August 22, 2026
Vacuum Tubes
Vacuum tubes work like transistors in that they allow a small current to control a much larger one. This is necessary for the amplification of radio signals that are very weak. In the case of the vacuum tube, electrons on a grid block the flow of the larger current.
Monday, August 17, 2026
Wednesday, August 12, 2026
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
Friday, August 7, 2026
Tuesday, August 4, 2026
Why Humanity Will Never Leave The Solar System
Re: Christian DESTROYS Evolutionist Teacher
To: J
Of course, this video comes across as staged rather than spontaneous.
My degree is in biology, and my education convinced me that evolution is the best explanation for the diversity of life.
I'm not going to claim to know everything, but I do try to stay well informed about the subjects I have opinions on.
I feel that the video is full of inaccuracies, and I don't think a real biologist would respond the way the person in the video does.
The claim that there are no transitional species is simply false. The fossil record is incomplete and never will be complete, but many of the species we have discovered can reasonably be viewed as transitional between earlier and later forms. For example, there is a well-documented transition between land mammals and whales and dolphins.
However, every time paleontologists discover a new fossil that fills a gap—for example, if they connect species A and C by finding an intermediate species B—critics simply argue that we are now missing the transitions between A and B, and between B and C. The expectation of an infinitely detailed fossil record is unrealistic. Fossilization is a rare event, and evolution often proceeds relatively rapidly in response to changing environmental pressures, leaving comparatively few fossils from those transitional populations.
There are a couple of facts that are strongly supported by the evidence:
1. The Earth is very old.
2. Simpler organisms appeared before more complex ones.
How did the more complex organisms arise? One could argue that God created them directly, but we do not have physical evidence for that. The simpler scientific explanation is that complex organisms evolved from simpler ones. Many creationists try to challenge the mechanisms by asking questions such as, "How could this possibly work?" But even if we did not fully understand every mechanism, that would not change the historical evidence that evolution occurred. The evidence tells us that it happened.
That said, we do have a good understanding of the mechanisms involved. DNA replication is not a perfect process, and extremely small mutations occur in every generation. If too many harmful mutations accumulate, the organsim is often not viable. In fact, roughly half of all pregnancies end in spontaneous miscarriage before the mother even realizes she is pregnant, often because of chromosomal or other genetic abnormalities.
Some mutations, however, are neutral or beneficial. Those mutations increase genetic diversity, and that diversity gives populations a better chance of surviving changing environmental pressures. Over many generations, natural selection acting on that genetic variation can produce the large-scale evolutionary changes observed in the fossil record and in living organisms.
Some limited evolution has been observed in organisms alive today.
P.S. I meant to add that birds are part of Theropods that make up dinosaurs. Many theropod dinosaurs shared characteristics in common with birds, such as feathers.
Birds have been reclassified as avian dinosaurs, with only the non-avian dinosaurs considered extinct. I'm not totally comfortable with this change in classification. It seems to me that birds are different enough from what we think of as dinosaurs to be considered separate from them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theropoda
"Birds are the only extant members of Dinosauria, and are a type of paravian theropods."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird
Saturday, August 1, 2026
The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8715
Friday, July 31, 2026
Why Fauci's Pardon Won't Protect Him From This
Many conservative commentators that I like regularly make statements about the pandemic that aren't supported by research. The truth is that masks and the vaccines slowed the spread of the disease. I have read the studies. The truth is that the vaccines reduced overall mortality at all ages.
Fauci deserves at least some credit for dealing with a major crisis under difficult circumstances. Instead, people want to condemn him over actions they find questionable. It is easy to second-guess people when you are not the one facing tremendous responsibility.
Saturday, July 25, 2026
Thursday, July 23, 2026
Satellite growth
Where Did Ancient Humans Go to the Bathroom? The Surprising Truth!
The confusion comes from the fact that several different events are being conflated. They are not all referring to the same thing.
Here's a rough timeline based on the current evidence:
- ~300,000 years ago: Homo sapiens first appears in Africa.
- ~195,000–130,000 years ago: There is evidence that human populations went through one or more severe bottlenecks, although their causes and severity are still debated. Some researchers link these to long periods of climatic stress, while others argue they resulted from a combination of factors. This is likely what Google AI was referring to.
- ~74,000 years ago: The eruption of the volcano at Lake Toba occurred. It was once thought to have nearly wiped out humanity, but that hypothesis is no longer widely accepted.
- ~70,000–60,000 years ago: Southern Africa experienced periods of severe drought associated with changing climate. Archaeological sites such as Pinnacle Point and Blombos Cave show that coastal populations survived by exploiting seafood, shellfish, and other marine resources. These populations also developed sophisticated stone tools and symbolic behavior.
- ~70,000–50,000 years ago: Modern humans began expanding out of Africa, eventually reaching Asia, Europe, and Australia.
- ~50,000 years ago: The Upper Paleolithic began in Europe. This date marks the appearance of advanced stone-tool industries there, not the end of an African drought. Humans had already been behaving in "Upper Paleolithic" ways in parts of Africa for tens of thousands of years.
The statement that "only about 7,000 humans survived" also needs some qualification. Older studies often estimated an effective breeding population of only a few thousand individuals. More recent genetic studies usually estimate an effective population size of roughly 1,000–10,000 breeding individuals, which does not mean there were only that many people alive. The actual census population may have been several times larger.
So the dates you've seen correspond to different ideas:
- 190,000 years ago: An early proposed population bottleneck.
- 70,000–60,000 years ago: A later period of climatic stress in southern Africa and the expansion of coastal populations.
- 50,000 years ago: The beginning of the Upper Paleolithic in Europe.
The version you previously read—that a drought reduced humans to a relatively small coastal population in southern Africa that later expanded—is still a plausible summary of one influential hypothesis. However, archaeologists today tend to view the story as more complex, with multiple climate fluctuations and population bottlenecks rather than a single catastrophic event that almost exterminated humanity.
What’s the only country in all four hemispheres??
@john2001plus 1 minute ago
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Sunday, July 19, 2026
Re: Cyclospora
Here in Utah, Taco Bell is highly suspect because they get their lettuce from Mexico.
- Better with fat: Lycopene is fat-soluble. Eating lycopene-rich foods with healthy fats (like cooking tomatoes in olive oil or eating them with avocado) boosts your body's absorption by up to 4.4 times. [1, 2, 3]
- Better when cooked: Heating and processing tomatoes (e.g., in tomato paste, sauce, or salsa) actually makes lycopene more bioavailable than eating them raw. [1]
- Blood Sugar Control: Because it resists digestion, it does not cause blood sugar spikes. Some research indicates it can also increase insulin sensitivity. [1, 2]
- Gut Health & Digestion: It acts as a prebiotic, nourishing your microbiome and protecting the lining of the colon, which may lower the risk of colorectal cancer. [1, 2]
- Weight Management: By fueling the production of satiety hormones like GLP-1, it helps you feel full longer. [1]
Saturday, July 18, 2026
Cyclospora
Tuesday, July 14, 2026
Sunday, July 12, 2026
Why Are We the Only Human Species Left? What happened to others...
Monday, July 6, 2026
Sunday, July 5, 2026
Saturday, July 4, 2026
Thursday, July 2, 2026
Wednesday, July 1, 2026
Saturday, June 27, 2026
Friday, June 26, 2026
Sugar Alcohols Ruined My Health
2 years ago
I didn't notice sugar-alcohols in very many products. I have occasionally bought no-sugar-added mini-pies that contain sugar-alcohols. They give me gas, but as long as I eat them in moderation, I am fine. Too much can have a laxative effect.
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
Saturday, June 20, 2026
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Sunday, June 14, 2026
Antares Nuclear Mark-0 Microreactor Achieves Criticality at Idaho National Lab
Thursday, June 11, 2026
Microsoft Announce Majorana 2 Quantum Chip
Wednesday, June 10, 2026
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
Monday, June 8, 2026
Saturday, June 6, 2026
100 Year old Lobster!
@umustwantme
4 months ago
"Where have you been"?
"I was abducted by aliens,... Again"!!
@Hala-ataa
2 months ago
I heard Celine Dion humming as he disappeared in the water
@Sana_foxian
1 year ago (edited)
For everyone else wondering: No the lobster is not dead, he's just old as hell and when you're old moving is hard but he is alive. His eyes legs and even antennae move in this video he is alive.
@remedyhunter3561
1 year ago
fun fact: when lobsters get this old they don’t die of “old age” like humans do, their telomeres don’t wear down like humans so they can’t age to death. instead they get so massive (like this distinguished gentleman) that when they molt out of their shell it gets progressively more and more difficult, until they die in the process. that’s why he said he probably has only a couple years left, he’s reaching the limit of manageable size
Friday, June 5, 2026
Thursday, June 4, 2026
Wednesday, June 3, 2026
Sunday, May 31, 2026
Thursday, May 28, 2026
Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Sunday, May 24, 2026
Friday, May 22, 2026
Thursday, May 21, 2026
Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Saturday, May 16, 2026
Cancer Mystery Solved: Scientists Discover How Melanoma Becomes “Immortal”
Eventually, telomeres shrink to a critical length, triggering a process called replicative senescence. At that point, the cell can no longer divide. This natural limit acts as one of the body’s important defenses against cancer.
Tumors must bypass that barrier to survive.
Many cancers accomplish this by reactivating telomerase, an enzyme that rebuilds telomeres and extends a cell’s lifespan. In melanoma, mutations in the TERT gene, which produces telomerase, are especially common. About 75% of melanoma tumors carry these mutations.
But there was a puzzle researchers could not explain.
How Much Protein Do You Really Need?
Tuesday, May 12, 2026
The Most Impressive Anti-Aging Supplement
- Brain Health & Cognition: Supplementation has been shown to reverse age-associated cognitive decline and support overall brain health in both human and animal models.
- Physical Strength & Mobility: Older adults taking GlyNAC experienced significant improvements in muscle strength, gait speed, and exercise capacity.
- Metabolic Health: Studies found GlyNAC reduces insulin resistance and improves mitochondrial fuel oxidation, which is particularly beneficial for those with type 2 diabetes or metabolic dysfunction.
- Cellular Protection: It reduces chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and genomic damage (DNA damage), which are key hallmarks of aging.
- Specific Conditions: Benefits have also been observed in patients with HIV, where it helped correct premature aging defects and improved quality of life.