Saturday, January 31, 2026
Coal is Extremely Dumb
Tell it to the Chinese who keep building coal plants.
Reportedly, Biden closed coal plants. What gives him that right? Shouldn't people have the free choice to use coal if that is their best option? I'm not saying it is their best option, but do we live in a free society where people can make choices? Is coal so bad that the choice should be taken away? I acknowledge that it might be. I am also concerned about pollutants.
If solar and batteries are cheaper in 30 years then people will choose that, but I'm skeptical because I have been hearing this for decades. I'm also not sure that so-called renewables can meet our energy needs. For the moment, fossil fuels are the most reliable sources of energy.
We don't have infinite energy resources. Reportedly, we have about 45 to 50 years of oil reserves remaining. Likewise, I have heard that most fossil fuels will be depleted by the year 2100. Ironically, the fossil fuel that will last the longest, and the one that we will be forced to use in the next century, is coal.
I've long thought that geothermal would be a limitless source of energy, and I've heard that some progress has been made in that area.
I am a climate alarmism skeptic because of the data on temperature and CO2. Around 2010, actual climate scientists were saying that the Climate Sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 is 6 to 12 degrees celsius. I watched many videos about this. However, the data doesn't support this at all. The data indicates that it might be around 2 degrees. Early in that decade, it was very common to hear them say, "We are on track to raise the average atmospheric temperature by 3 degrees by the year 2100, and that would be bad. However, if we can get it down to 2 degrees then this would still be bad, but manageable." I heard this repeatedly. However, by the end of the decade, I was watching videos where the numbers had changed. They gave the exact same speech, but said that 2 degrees would be very bad, but if we could just get it down to 1.5 degrees then that would be manageable. They moved the goal post. The reasons for this might be complicated, but I remember the IPCC accepting a paper that cited 20nth century data indicating that the climate sensitivity might only be 1.5 degrees.
Friday, January 30, 2026
Wednesday, January 28, 2026
Tuesday, January 27, 2026
Monday, January 26, 2026
Brown Bears
Saturday, January 24, 2026
The Night Texas Hit 140°F (60°C) During a Thunderstorm
Thursday, January 22, 2026
How long would you survive with no DNA?
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Saturday, January 17, 2026
Friday, January 16, 2026
Thursday, January 15, 2026
This Food Component Cuts Visceral Fat in Half (Science-backed)
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
They are all just big cat 🥰🥰
Monday, January 12, 2026
Large-scale Vitamin D study on Telomeres, an important Marker of Aging
0 seconds ago
I'm concerned that the study doesn't control for the Omega-3 intake, although taking both sounds like a good idea. I'm already taking Vitamin D. However, I'm not a doctor nor a medical expert.
I'm also concerned that he doesn't provide a link to the study. I found the article on the The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition website: https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(25)00255-2/abstract
I believe in, "Trust, but verify". I would like to see more studies.
According to Google AI...
"Yes, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (AJCN) is a highly reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing primary research, considered a top source in nutrition and dietetics, though it's published by the American Society for Nutrition (ASN), which receives funding from food/beverage industry partners, a point some critics raise regarding potential influence. Its high impact factor and publication of rigorous studies on topics like obesity, metabolism, and vitamins underscore its scientific standing. "
Sunday, January 11, 2026
94% of the Universe is Gone Forever
Friday, January 9, 2026
Thursday, January 8, 2026
Re: Evolution Tells Us We Might Be The Only Intelligent Life in the Universe
I believe the universe is teaming with life. However, who's to say that intelligent life elsewhere, even worries about radio transmissions?On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 9:33 PM John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com> wrote:I only watched the first 2.5 minutes. He said that we have no evidence of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, as if this were an important part of his argument. Although that statement is technically correct, the distances involved are so vast that it is unlikely we could detect their radio signals—or that they could detect ours.If we look at the evolution of life on Earth, we see incredible resilience. Once life starts, it finds a way; it adapts.
There are many examples of convergent evolution, where unrelated species independently evolve similar traits. For example, complex eyes evolved multiple times in different lineages, and several unrelated species independently evolved crab-like body plans.
What evolution shows us is that it adapts to incentives. Creatures become faster because they need to. Animals that benefit from greater intelligence evolve it. Only a few species are intelligent, while most are not, for the simple reason that they do not need to be. Intelligence is energetically expensive, and it is often more efficient not to have it.
Once life begins, I think it has the potential to produce intelligence. If we could travel to another world with life, we would likely see an enormous variety of organisms. Some of them would look familiar, because the patterns that work here could also work elsewhere.
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Evolution Tells Us We Might Be The Only Intelligent Life in the Universe
If we look at the evolution of life on Earth, we see incredible resilience. Once life starts, it finds a way; it adapts.
There are many examples of convergent evolution, where unrelated species independently evolve similar traits. For example, complex eyes evolved multiple times in different lineages, and several unrelated species independently evolved crab-like body plans.
What evolution shows us is that it adapts to incentives. Creatures become faster because they need to. Animals that benefit from greater intelligence evolve it. Only a few species are intelligent, while most are not, for the simple reason that they do not need to be. Intelligence is energetically expensive, and it is often more efficient not to have it.
Once life begins, I think it has the potential to produce intelligence. If we could travel to another world with life, we would likely see an enormous variety of organisms. Some of them would look familiar, because the patterns that work here could also work elsewhere.
The $200M Machine that Prints Microchips: The EUV Photolithography System
Tuesday, January 6, 2026
Monday, January 5, 2026
Sunday, January 4, 2026
When Noone Knows The Signs
3 weeks ago
They are on the verge of being turned into their original carbon components.